Get free access to
According to the CJEU’s April 20 ruling, the main doubt of the electromobility sector regarding the classification of vehicle charging under the Polish VAT law has been finally clarified.
The disputed issue concerned a company intending to conduct the business of installing and operating public electric vehicle charging stations. The services provided by the company on a case-by-case basis as part of the charging cycle, depending on the needs of the interested user, would include the following:
The company also intended to create a special platform to enable interested consumers to use the services. The company planned to charge an equal fee for all services.
The company applied for an individual tax ruling confirming that the planned activity constitutes a “supply of services” within the meaning of Article 8 of the Polish VAT Act. Ultimately, the case reached the Supreme Administrative Court, which decided to suspend the proceedings and refer a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the European Union as to whether the disputed service constitutes a supply of goods or a supply of services.
The court pointed out that:
Until now, under the VAT law, it was not clear how to qualify services related to charging electric cars. This is because there is no doubt that charging electric vehicles is a complex service, consisting of the supply of electricity and services consisting of providing access to the widely understood infrastructure. More than once the tax authorities have taken the position that such a service constitutes a supply of goods due to the fact that it is the consumption of electricity (and therefore goods) that is the primary purpose of charging station customers.
Given the above, there is no doubt that the ruling is significant. As already mentioned, charging electric cars constitutes a supply of goods. Adopting such a thesis entails a number of tax consequences. First of all, for the supply of electricity, the legislator has provided a specific moment of tax obligation related to the date of issuance of the invoice. Recognizing vehicle charging as a supply of goods also makes it necessary to determine the place of delivery, which is particularly important in transactions with foreign entities. The settlement proves that companies that have so far considered car charging as a service have acted incorrectly. However, in domestic transactions, this did not result in an understatement of tax. Companies that cooperated with foreign traders may have a problem – they did not report VAT on the transactions and will have to adjust their settlements.
It’s also worth mentioning that treating EV charging as an energy supply may also entail excise and regulatory implications.
However, despite the possible adjustments mentioned above, the commented ruling ultimately unifies the rules of taxation, an increasingly popular electric car benefit on the market.