Return to the Newsroom
Mailchimp - subscribe form sidebar

DAC 6 Reporting obligation for cross-border arrangements – comparison of implemented rules

October 20, 2021

Effective since June 25, 2018, the EU Council Directive 2011/16, or in short, the DAC 6 directive, covers the mandatory disclosure and automatic exchange of information among EU member states in the field of taxation related to reportable cross-border arrangements. The reporting obligation aims to strengthen tax transparency, prevent tax avoidance and tax evasion.

Download our brief overview, or read more below

When to report cross-border arrangements

The subjects of reporting are cross-border tax arrangements which meet at least one or more specific characteristics identified as potentially indicative of aggressive tax planning – the so-called hallmarks.

The hallmarks are the following:

  • Generic hallmarks linked to the main benefit test (confidentiality conditions, fee arrangements, standardized documentation)
  • Specific hallmarks linked to the main benefit test (acquiring a loss-making company, converting income into capital, gifts or other categories of revenue which are taxed at a lower level or exempt from tax, circular transactions resulting in the round-tripping of funds)
  • Specific hallmarks related to cross-border transactions (deductible cross-border payments made between two or more associated enterprises where one enterprise is resident in a jurisdiction with null or preferential tax regime (note: this is also linked to the main benefit test), deductible cross-border payments made between two or more associated enterprises where the recipient is not resident for tax purposes in any tax jurisdiction or is resident for tax purposes of a state listed by EU or OECD as being non-cooperative, depreciation deductions on the same asset claimed in more jurisdictions, relief from double taxation in respect of the same item of income or capital is claimed in more jurisdictions, transfers of assets that generate a material difference in the amount being treated as payable)
  • Specific hallmarks concerning automatic exchange of information and beneficial ownership (arrangements that are undermining the reporting obligation, arrangement involving a non-transparent legal or beneficial ownership chain)
  • Specific hallmarks concerning transfer pricing (use of unilateral safe harbour rules, the transfer of hard-to-value intangibles, intragroup cross-border transfer of functions and/or risks and/or assets)

Requirements for intermediaries and taxpayers

The primary person which is obliged to file the information is the so-called intermediary. It can be any person who:

  • designs, sells, organizes cross-border arrangements subject to reporting,
  • makes available for implementation or manages the implementation of a cross-border arrangement subject to reporting,
  • meets certain additional conditions.

The obligation may also fall on the relevant taxpayer (in other terms, the user), i.e. any person who:

  • is provided with a cross-border arrangement that is the subject of reporting for implementation, or
  • is prepared to implement a cross-border arrangement that is the subject of reporting, or
  • implemented the first stage of such an arrangement.

The relevant taxpayer or user is obliged to report the cross-border arrangement when they propose the reportable arrangement on their own (so-called in-house), when the intermediary is not from an EU member state or when the intermediary is bound by a legal duty of confidentiality.

Failure to comply with DAC6 rules can result in penalties.

Comparison of implemented DAC 6 rules in 5 European countries

General overview

  Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia
Implementation of Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 (DAC6) Yes, through the Act No.  343/2020 Coll. By this act the Act No. 164/2013 Coll. on international cooperation in the field of taxation was amended. Yes, through the Act 72 of 2019. By this act the Act 37 of 2013 on rules for international administrative cooperation in relation to taxes and other charges was amended. Yes, implemented into Tax Ordinance Act. DAC 6 rules have been introduced within the Romanian legislation through the Fiscal Procedure Code. Yes, through the Act No.  305/2019 Coll. By this act the Act No. 442/2012 Coll. on international cooperation in the field of taxation was amended.
Effective date 29 August 2020 1 July 2020 1 January 2019 1 July 2020 1 July 2020
Implementation of transitory regime of Council Directive (EU) 2020/876 Yes, the following rules apply:

A reportable cross-border arrangement where the first step in its implementation has been made between 25 June 2018 and 30 June 2020 – by 28 February 2021
A reportable cross-border arrangement where the first step in its implementation has been made between 1 July 2020 and 29 August 2020 – by 30 January 2021
Periodic reporting of reportable cross-border arrangement made available for implementation up to 31 December 2020 – by 30 January 2021

Yes Yes (various deadlines, depending on the obligation) Yes Yes, 6 months.
Reportable cross-border arrangement definition Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Also domestic arrangements to be reported in Poland Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive
Hallmark definition Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive
Definition of associated enterprise Yes, similar to the definition of “related parties” in the Income Tax Act. The definition of an associated enterprise is set out in Act 37 of 2013 4.§ (9) 9. point. Reference to the definition of “related parties” in the Income Tax Act, which is used for TP purposes. Follows DAC 6 Directive Reference to the definition of “related parties” in the Income Tax Act, which is used for TP purposes.
Taxes covered Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive + VAT Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive

Hallmarks

  Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia
Are the hallmarks covered by the domestic legislation the same as in Annex IV Part II of the DAC6 Directive? Yes Yes Yes (the catalogue under the Polish Tax Code is broader) Yes Yes
Are there any other additional hallmarks included in the domestic legislation? No No Yes (24 hallmarks in total) No No
Guidance – whitelisted examples per hallmark Yes No Yes (guidance) By the beginning of 2021 Ro Tax Authority has published a guideline related to DAC 6 No
Guidance – Blacklisted examples per hallmark No No Yes (guidance) By the beginning of 2021 Ro Tax Authority has published a guideline related to DAC 6 No
Has main benefit test been incorporated into domestic legislation? Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Yes Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive

Reporting obligations

  Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia
Intermediaries Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive
Relevant taxpayers Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive
Other measures No No Facilitator (reports only if not done by promoter or beneficiary) No No

Reporting guidelines

  Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia
How to file a DAC6 return? Electronically using specific DAC 6 form. Electronically through a portal of the Hungarian Tax Office using specific KONSTR form. Electronically through a portal of the Polish Financial Administration using specific DAC 6 form. To be submitted exclusively online, on the Ro Tax Authority portal. Electronically through a portal of the Slovak Financial Administration using specific DAC 6 form.
Language Czech or English (additional translation to Czech may be required) Hungarian Polish Romanian Slovak
Information to be communicated Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive Follows DAC 6 Directive
Time limits for mainstream reporting 30 day period 30 day period 30 days As a general rule, intermediaries having the obligation to report transfrontalier transactions would have 30 days to provide the related info. 30 day period

Penalties

  Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia
Penalties for non-compliance Up to CZK 500 000 for each breach of obligations Up to HUF 5,000,000 Up to EUR 5,800,000.00 Ranging between RON 20,000 – 100,000 Up to EUR 30 000 (can by levied repeatedly)

The Table shows that some countries when implementing the DAC6 rules went beyond minimum requirements required by the EU directive. For example, Poland extended the scope of reportable transactions to domestic transactions, too. Moreover, they defined additional hallmarks and aim also on VAT. Also penalties for non-compliance, although they differ from country to country, may be material. Therefore, we recommend taxpayers taking care of these rules.

We recommend taxpayers evaluating the cross-border arrangements in which they were/are involved in terms of the above-mentioned characteristics, in order to identify a possible reporting obligation and checking presence of specific DAC6 reporting requirements given by local legislation. The reporting obligation arises only in case when you identify arrangements that are subject to the reporting. Keeping of defence file can help you to prove that you act in compliance with legislation.

Does the reporting obligation apply to you? Find out from our questionnaire

Disclaimer: Our questionnaire does not represent a comprehensive analysis of a cross-border arrangement. The questionnaire is meant to help determine whether a person is obliged to file the corresponding documentation based on general criteria only. Accace is not responsible for any person’s or entity’s decisions taken based on our questionnaire’s results. Before taking any action, we recommend you to consult an advisor.

Mailchimp - subscribe form sidebar
downloadcrosschevron-leftarrow-leftarrow-right